Bankrupt by AI

01Independent market analysis

There are two ways to go bankrupt with AI.

Some companies bet the balance sheet on automation that isn’t ready. Others sit still until the market quietly reprices everything they do. Both go broke — just from opposite ends of the same scale. We track both patterns, measure how overheated the market is, and publish the moves that survive contact with reality.

No dunking, no doom. We analyze patterns, not people — and every case closes with the move that would’ve worked instead.

Departures

Famous last words — either way.

79/100 · Heated
Chapter 11Overheated

We do everything with AI now. — We’ve always managed without it. — The model can check its own work. — We’ll wait and see how it shakes out. — We replaced the whole team. — Our moat is twenty years deep.

InsuranceLogisticsB2B softwareEngineering servicesRetail bankingHealthcare administrationLegal servicesManufacturingE-commercePublic sector

02The instrument

AI market temperature

A composite of six indicators — from earnings-call rhetoric to automation reversals — normalized and weighted into one reading. Both ends of the scale are failure zones; the middle is the operating band.

FrozenCoolBalancedHeatedOverheated0255075100Failure zoneOperating bandFailure zone79

03The two failure patterns

Both ends of the scale are failure zones.

Failure pattern · Overheated

All in on the hype

Headcount cut before the workflow is proven. Forty pilots and no owner. An AI label on the pitch deck doing the work the product should do. Overheating is not enthusiasm — it is spending conviction faster than evidence accumulates.

Early symptoms

  • Automation announced before it is measured
  • Pilots multiply while production stays flat
  • The AI story outruns the P&L
The overheated end · Case Files

Failure pattern · Frozen

All out, on principle

Refusal rarely looks like refusal — it looks like prudence. But while the hype cycle burns other people’s money, the frozen firm loses bids to competitors who quietly automated the boring parts. Standing still is also a bet.

Early symptoms

  • “We’ve always done it this way” as strategy
  • No owned capability, no experiments, no map
  • Talent and bids drift to faster rivals
The frozen end · The Freeze

Standing analysis

The monitor runs continuously.

Six indicators, revised every quarter, tracked as one series. Not to predict the market — to notice when conviction and evidence drift apart.

The monitor runs continuously. 36, 42, 48, 55, 64, 71, 75, 79Q3 ’24 · 36Q4 ’24 · 42Q1 ’25 · 48Q2 ’25 · 55Q3 ’25 · 64Q4 ’25 · 71Q1 ’26 · 75Q2 ’26 · 79
Open the market monitor

Instruments

Run your own numbers.

Three calculators that turn this site’s claims into something you can test: the reversal bill, the waiting curve, and the five-test scorer.

  • 01The five-test scorer
  • 02The reversal calculator
  • 03The waiting meter
Open the instruments

What to do instead

Strategy between the extremes

Five tests that separate automation that compounds from automation that corrodes — plus a cooling-down sequence for the overheated and a starting sequence for the frozen.

  • 01Cost of a wrong answer
  • 02Reversibility
  • 03Escape hatch
  • 04Feedback loop
  • 05Volume vs. judgment
Open the playbook

05Coverage

Patterns don’t respect borders.

The named case files are pinned where they happened — across Europe, Asia and the Americas — with arcs carrying each into the review desk. The fainter dots are the anonymized composites.

On the record, mapped

Bright pins are named case files at their real locations; faint dots are anonymized composites. Patterns, not people.

Need this overview for your own house?

Bankrupt by AI is run by Balane GmbH. We help leadership teams separate good automation from bad, set kill criteria, and build an AI capability plan that doesn’t bet the company.

Request a strategy briefing